Skech, Inc. [Sic]

PRODUCED BY-A Meandering Club & Gad About Co.

[AMC&GAC]

A Division of Grim Shadowy Form
A Limited Liability Company
[GSF,LLC]

__________________________________________

“No, Meg, don’t hope it was a dream. I don’t understand it anymore than you do. But one thing I have learned is that you don’t have to understand things for them to be…..”

The art of prose exists because the words are not objects but designations for objects.

Prose is an attitude of mind.

Beauty hides in a book; It acts by persuasion like the charm of a voice or a face. It does not coerce; it inclines a person without his suspecting it, and he thinks that he is yielding to arguments when he is really being solicited by a charm he does not see.

The dead are there [in the library]; The only thing they have done is write. They’ve long since been washed clean of the sin of living and their lives are known only through books which other dead men have written about them.

In one sense, it is a possession; The reader lends himself to the dead in order that they might come back to life.

In another sense, it is contact with the beyond.

Literature and Existentialism, Jean-Paul Sartre


…………gather round the children and elders, as I will tell a tale of Once, Back When We All Lived In The Forest…….

The tale is nothing, if not novel and authentic. I readily admit the probable likelihood of disputes issuing forth once I’ve told my unheard tale.

You’ll say that you have heard this one from somewhere before.

The sensation persuading you to disbelieve me is itself the evidence that I advance in support of the validity of the two assertions I aver of my tale-it is untold and authentic.

For, do you not know that all tales of, Once, When We All Lived In The Forest, are the same tale being told anew in novel forms. The stories endure existence because we never stop wanting to hear them. We never stop wanting to hear them because we’ve always heard them. But, it is not in the way we hear phones ring, cars alarm,or birds chirp.

The sound of a story is the sound of one’s own pulse. Can you really conceive of the sound that your pulse makes? I experience my pulse, more than I hear it-although it certainly is audible. After physical exertion, I hear it loudly, sometimes, even ringing in my ears until my heartbeat begins to still. Fear, complete quiet, and stillness make my own pulse sound the loudest.

The sound of my pulse goes unnoticed by my awareness most of the time. I presume this results from my awareness having been exposed to the constant, continuing sound of my pulse during every single moment of my existence.

Eventually, my brain said, “Enough! Let’s just tune that one out. We’ve got more stimuli in this very second than the sense facilities of this meat bag could ever experience, let just go ahead and not waste energy on perceiving the pulse. That sound will continue until the meat bag dies. I know avoiding death is sort of what my job here is all about, but we don’t need to monitor for the sound of the pulse. With pulse, I’m willing to go on the honor system. Besides, if I always listen for the pulse and the pulse is always audible until ceasing at death, I will never hear it cease because its cessation is the end of my ability to hear. “

So it is with story. The ‘me,”myself,’ and, ‘I’ (used when a self references its own self hood) exist because humans have story as a sense organ. The organ differentiates humans from other mammals.

The story organ creates a self out of the development of a homo sapien. What human can be said to not have self-hood?

What is a self and how is it by which some organisms and not others come to possess self hood? Is it possible to possess self hood but have no awareness of your own self?

“The irony and obsessions of Cioran’s philosophy” (Marius Nica)………a new name to me.

https://wp.me/p1gja9-3Na

Cheers to the author for this work.

Such an interesting and thoughtful piece on a writer and thinker.

The author discusses Romanian contemplator Emil Cioran and his relationship to atheism, skepticism, and mysticism.


Favorite quote from the author of this paper:

…..then that person has not really read Cioran. Perhaps they have leafed through some pages, read some ideas which they mirrored their own experiences into, their own projections on an existence which is impossible to transcend.

Favorite Cioran quotes included in this work:

If the difference between man and animal is the fact that the animal cannot be but animal, whereas the man can be inhuman, which is something other than himself-in this case I am unhuman.

My experiences became books, as if they had written themselves.

The writing is only valuable when it objectifies a feeling, because beyond the expression there is life, and beyond the form there is content.

Between the passion for ecstacy and the horror of the void the entire mysticism revolves.

Distend to extend to disabuse

This is why I stretch.

To disabuse my body of the notion that it is this way or that.

This is why I do not break.

This is why I walk, to disabuse myself of the notion I am a sedentary stone.

This is why I breath, to disabuse myself of the notion that life is pain.

There’s this face

It’s a face in my minds eye, that of a man.

A particular man, whose face I knew not until gravaty presented it.

The cheeks of older, the eyes of “I’m sure I know you from before”.

Effing idiot, you do not end sentences with prepositions.

Silly boy in need of correcting.

Sir, should you prefer.

I am Miss and I will shatter your soul to pieces of glad bliss.

Speak, won’t you?`

Lipsome venom

Benevolent disrespect with intent of disrming.

Shamefully disarming with easy kindness that makes man howl.

Gracious pain unexpected spurns blissful.

So breath deep in anticipation.

Silent sensory

Tell me I’m wrong and to stop my shameful wantoness.

No one will. They see it not or remain silent in want or delusion.

Squeak out or leap and jump til I’m dizzy.

I’m simple but elegant in my simplicity.

My intelligence is eerie and of touch.

To exploit is to ruin that sought.

So just show lovesome, desperate want.

Turning out

It must be taught, sometimes trained.

Only delicately forced, by choice.

Desire and drive, to a specific end.

That’s the pleasure of one. And the other who relents.

The absence thereof is the sorrow of another one.

Swelling into dew kissed morning wettness.

What can you do?

Disposition? Super proud of my handwriting

Such esoteria. I write my best to music and with limited awareness.

WTF does that even mean?

Glad for it on my end,

Verbal alchemy…

Shallow

hallow

hollow

wallow

Swallow

Wallows

Swollaw

Wollaw

Watch “Velvet Underground-“Venus in Furs” from “Velvet Underground and Nico” LP” on YouTube

https://youtu.be/iLQzaLr1enE

No rights owned.

If ya dont get it, suppose it’s not for you yet.

If ya do feel it, cheers

So do I on this fine Friday.

Prestidigitation

Who and what lady does not love fancy fingering from a fellow?

Percussive and resonant.

Fugue played on breath and flesh

Breath, respite, breath….etc.

Unapologetic forwards.

Shuddering into turn outs, again and again

And round about.

Cloaked in opaque context doing little to hide the fact of desire.

Suppose it is what is,

Ad well as what it might and will be.

Watch “Into Dust, Mazzy Star” on YouTube

Dont own rights.

This song bursts my soul apart.

Not sure I can finish it now, in fact.

If you ain’t heard bout this ‘un, give it a listen all the way thru.

Powerful.

Precarious

Subject to continued risk;

that may be taken away at another’s pleasure or by accident ; uncertain.

Subject or leading to danger.

Not firmly established ; untrustworthy.

Smug?

From the Latin meaning to obtain by entreaty

Watch “I Want You (She’s So Heavy)” on YouTube

I want you so bad, babe.

Its driving me mad.

Shes so heavy.

That simple and endless.

Bass on guitar? What is spot on?

An example of perfect mix

Back when heavy meant something else too?

Watch “David Bowie – Rock ‘N’ Roll Suicide (Live) (Great quality)” on YouTube

Holy effing snap. A classic from Ziggy becomes epic here.

Disarmimg.

We USians have the right to bear arms, and so, presumably, raccoon arms too, < whatever the eff that’s about> but this is beside the point.

Consider disarmourment as a means of disarming.

Someone in the know cued me into these words. Thank you to that fellow, who prob doesn’t have no idea. He.

Let’s consider:

Disarm

I. t. 1. To cause to surrender arms; deprive of weapons or the like. 2. To deprive of power to harm or annoy ; quell ; allay.

II. i. To lay aside arms; reduce a land or naval armament from a war to a peace footing.

A peace footing is getting on the dexter foot, I presume.

Watch “The Velvet Underground – Rock & Roll” on YouTube

Dont own rights but have mad love for these ‘uns.

Good intro song for non-fans.

Take a moment to appreciate the tension in the picture. Highlarious.

See if ya recognize any of ’em.

Watch “Portishead – Roads” on YouTube

Dont own right, but pay mad homage.

So lovesomely sexy.

Is was another day.

The sun shied back into the woods, partially concealed behind a cloak of mist and residual angular trajectory.

It gave the morning a quintessence of allure and glamour, even including that tinge of melancholy which the Vested feel.

I suppose nostalgia may be a more apt descriptor than melancholy.

Then again, I guess both words are completely right & dexter yet, simulateously, inappropriate.

The sun tests the boundary condition between night and day; everyday it rises.

I test the boundary condition within to see how supple and malleable I be without shattering into infinity just yet.

Идіотъ The Idiot…remarks from an idiot

Fyodor Dostoevsky, as this gal understands, is no fool.

I read The Idiot in highschool, for personal ed as opposed to curriculum and yes, it was because I wanted to impress myself by reading Russian lit unguided. And yes, referencing this on AP exams 15 yrs ago was conducive to high scores.

However, I was spared the light~gel of literary criticism in my reading of The Idiot.

It was only later I heard I heard this novel was widely allegeded to be a mere allegory for Christ.

Screw that. Dostoevsky knew better.

So did Augustine.

See it and them another way.